GPUs are closer to the brain's architecture

I've become fascinated by GPUs because I realize they are thousands of little mini-CPUS, which is an architecture that resembles the brain. I wonder how they can push this further and explicitly make a chip that has as many interconnections as possible between extremely simple processors. Like, fabricate a completely new type of CPU, it doesn't have to be fast or complex, but it should maximize BANDWIDTH between the different little cells. That's how the brain works: with 100 billion neurons, each one connected to between 1-10,000 other neurons via synapses. Estimated 1,000 trillion synapses. How can we fabricate a chip that comes close to this amount of interconnection? 3D overlaid connections? lots of little subsections that are super-duper-interconnected? it doesn't have to resemble the biological brain in anything except this general topological feature of super-interconnection. probably intelligence will arise if we can do this.

i.e. neuromorphic chip

https://johnkoetsier.com/artificial-brain-neuromorphic-chip/

So computers of the future will likely be microservices architecture housed in data centers, which will have terminal connections to traditional computers housed on smartphones and laptops. And the computer in the datacenter will actually be thousands of computers of different architectures: neuromorphic for analog neural networks, traditional von Neumann CPUs, GPUs for parallel processing, and quantum for some specialized tasks.

Imagine a "brain" with access to all of these different types of computing, and with access to huge amounts of storage, of different latencies (super-fast, and slower for lots of other stuff), and networked into the internet.

How to be impactful

Every person has a finite amount of time to move their bodies and speak words and that's true for the richest and the poorest. It's our job to use that ability to make an impact. If you serve on many committees and do many things you are diluting your ability to have a big impact.

Push a pin vs push a coin, putting all your attention on a single goal.

Because most people in the world are focused on themselves or otherwise everyone is working at cross-purposes so through that fog of disinterest it's often possible to push a very single-minded agenda through and get a surprisingly large thing accomplished, but only IF you spend all your very finite amount of body movement on a narrow goal (and/or rally others around you towards that same goal).

Orders of magnitude

It is a cliché to observe that the space between objects in outer space is much, much larger than our intuition might expect. But there are several levels of structure:

...

0. people

1. planets/moons/stars 10^3 - 10^5 km (diameter of earth or jupiter)

2. stars 10^6-10^7 (sun or supergiant)

2. solar systems 10^9 km (distance to Pluto)

3. oort clouds 10^13 km (200k AU)

3. galaxies 10^17 (100k ly)

4. galaxy clusters 10^20 (30m ly

It's true that the orders of magnitude stretch on, but the biggest magnitudes are the ones:

between nucleus of atom and the electron shell diamater

AND

between distance between planets and distance between stars.

the other distances are actually not too bad.

nucleus of atom is 2 × 10 -15 m

diameter of atom is 1 x 10 - 10 m (5 orders of mag!!!)

diameter of sun vs diameter of pluto orbit (boost 3 orders of mag)

distance between planets: 10^8 to 10^9 km

distance between stars: 10^12 to 10^13 km (boost 3 orders of mag)

distance between galaxies relative to size of galaxy:

(100k ly vs 3m ly is only 1 order of mag!)

More nuclear

Shouldn't adding additional reactors to already-approved nuclear power plants be a great idea? then you avoid the costly permit process and you can presumably take advantage of some of the existing infrasturcture, at the very least the security perimeter, etc. is it a matter of the expense of building out additional transmission capacity out of the plant that makes this not feasible?

We should be aiming to make electricity 10x cheaper and consume 10x more electricity while using nuclear for most of the base load and solar just for peaking where it makes sense (in desert locations or decentralized applications like on remote homes)

The "Tree Cover" trope

Something I frequently notice in movies and TV shows that is totally unrealistic: two characters having a conversation, or one character doing something, and another character watches, listens, but is otherwise not in view of the others.

In real life, when you are outside doing something, another person can't be 10 metres away and you are not aware of them. People are not that unobservant.

Also, in real life, people do not have a lot of conversations out in public where anyone can listen. Especially super important business conversations.

The worst show for this was Damages - I remember every episode featured like 10 scenes of this.

viz. https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/TreeCover